19.5 Residue Theorem
INTRODUCTION
We saw in the last section that if the complex function f has an isolated singularity at the point z0, then f has a Laurent series representation
which converges for all z near z0. More precisely, the representation is valid in some deleted neighborhood of z0, or punctured open disk, 0 < |z − z0| < R. In this section our entire focus will be on the coefficient a−1 and its importance in the evaluation of contour integrals.
Residue
The coefficient a−1 of 1/(z − z0) in the Laurent series given above is called the residue of the function f at the isolated singularity z0. We shall use the notation
to denote the residue of f at z0. Recall, if the principal part of the Laurent series valid for 0 < |z − z0| < R contains a finite number of terms with a−n the last nonzero coefficient, then z0 is a pole of order n; if the principal part of the series contains an infinite number of terms with nonzero coefficients, then z0 is an essential singularity.
EXAMPLE 1 Residues
(a) In Example 2 of Section 19.4 we saw that z = 1 is a pole of order 2 of the function f(z) = 1/(z − 1)2(z − 3). From the Laurent series given in that example we see that the coefficient of 1/(z − 1) is a−1 = Res (f(z), 1) = − .
(b) Example 6 of Section 19.3 showed that z = 0 is an essential singularity of f(z) = e3/z. From the Laurent series given in that example we see that the coefficient of 1/z is a−1 = Res (f(z), 0) = 3. ≡
Later on in this section we will see why the coefficient a−1 is so important. In the meantime we are going to examine ways of obtaining this complex number when z0 is a pole of a function f without the necessity of expanding f in a Laurent series at z0. We begin with the residue at a simple pole.
THEOREM 19.5.1 Residue at a Simple Pole
If f has a simple pole at z = z0, then
(1)
PROOF:
Since z = z0 is a simple pole, the Laurent expansion of f about that point has the form
By multiplying both sides by z − z0 and then taking the limit as z → z0, we obtain (z − z0) f(z) = [a−1 + a0(z − z0) + a1(z − z0)2 + …] = a−1 = Res (f(z), z0). ≡
THEOREM 19.5.2 Residue at a Pole of Order n
If f has a pole of order n at z = z0, then
(2)
PROOF:
Since f is assumed to have a pole of order n, its Laurent expansion for 0 < |z − z0| < R must have the form
We multiply the last expression by (z − z0)n:
and then differentiate n − 1 times:
(3)
Since all the terms on the right side after the first involve positive integer powers of z − z0, the limit of (3) as z → z0 is
Solving the last equation for a−1 gives (2). ≡
Note that (2) reduces to (1) when n = 1.
EXAMPLE 2 Residue at a Pole
The function f(z) = has a simple pole at z = 3 and a pole of order 2 at z = 1. Use Theorems 19.5.1 and 19.5.2 to find the residue at each pole.
SOLUTION
Since z = 3 is a simple pole, we use (1):
Now at the pole of order 2 it follows from (2) that
When f is not a rational function, calculating residues by means of (1) can sometimes be tedious. It is possible to devise alternative residue formulas. In particular, suppose a function f can be written as a quotient f(z) = g(z)/h(z), where g and h are analytic at z = z0. If g(z0) ≠ 0 and if the function h has a zero of order 1 at z0, then f has a simple pole at z = z0 and
An alternative method for computing a residue at a simple pole.
(4)
To see this last result, we use (1) and the facts that h(z0) = 0 and that limz→z0(h(z) − h(z0))/(z − z0) is a definition of the derivative h′(z0):
Analogous formulas for residues at poles of order greater than 1 are complicated and will not be given.
EXAMPLE 3 Using (4) to Compute a Residue
The polynomial z4 + 1 can be factored as (z − z1)(z − z2)(z − z3)(z − z4), where z1, z2, z3, and z4 are the four distinct roots of the equation z4 + 1 = 0. It follows from Theorem 19.4.1 that the function
has four simple poles. Now from (10) of Section 17.2 we have z1 = eπi/4, z2 = e3πi/4, z3 = e5πi/4, z4 = e7πi/4. To compute the residues, we use (4) and Euler’s formula:
Residue Theorem
We come now to the reason for the importance of the residue concept. The next theorem states that under some circumstances, we can evaluate complex integrals dz by summing the residues at the isolated singularities of f within the closed contour C.
THEOREM 19.5.3 Cauchy’s Residue Theorem
Let D be a simply connected domain and C a simple closed contour lying entirely within D. If a function f is analytic on and within C, except at a finite number of singular points z1, z2, . . ., zn within C, then
(5)
PROOF:
Suppose C1, C2, . . ., Cn are circles centered at z1, z2, . . ., zn, respectively. Suppose further that each circle Ck has a radius rk small enough so that C1, C2, . . ., Cn are mutually disjoint and are interior to the simple closed curve C. See FIGURE 19.5.1. Recall that (15) of Section 19.3 implies dz = 2πi Res(f(z), zk), and so Theorem 18.2.2 gives
≡
EXAMPLE 4 Evaluation by the Residue Theorem
Evaluate where
(a) the contour C is the rectangle defined by x = 0, x = 4, y = −1, y = 1,
(b) the contour C is the circle |z| = 2.
SOLUTION
(a) Since both poles z = 1 and z = 3 lie within the square, we have from (5) that
We found these residues in Examples 2 and 3, and so
(b) Since only the pole z = 1 lies within the circle |z| = 2, we have from (5) that
≡
EXAMPLE 5 Evaluation by the Residue Theorem
Evaluate where the contour C is the circle |z − i| = 2.
SOLUTION
By writing z2 + 4 = (z − 2i)(z + 2i), we see that the integrand has simple poles at −2i and 2i. Now since only 2i lies within the contour C, it follows from (5) that
But
Hence, ≡
EXAMPLE 6 Evaluation by the Residue Theorem
Evaluate where the contour C is the circle |z| = 2.
SOLUTION
Since z4 + 5z3 = z3(z + 5) we see that the integrand has a pole of order 3 at z = 0 and a simple pole at z = −5. Since only z = 0 lies within the given contour, we have from (5) and (2)
≡
EXAMPLE 7 Evaluation by the Residue Theorem
Evaluate dz, where the contour C is the circle |z| = 2.
SOLUTION
The integrand tan z = sin z/cos z has simple poles at the points where cos z = 0. We saw in Section 17.7 that the only zeros for cos z are the real numbers z = (2n + 1)π/2, n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . . Since only −π/2 and π/2 are within the circle |z| = 2, we have
Now from (4) with g(z) = sin z, h(z) = cos z, and h′(z) = −sin z, we see that
Therefore, ≡
EXAMPLE 8 Evaluation by the Residue Theorem
Evaluate where the contour C is the circle |z| = 1.
SOLUTION
As we have seen, z = 0 is an essential singularity of the integrand f(z) = e3/z and so neither formula (1) nor (2) is applicable to find the residue of f at that point. Nevertheless, we saw in part (b) of Example 1 that the Laurent series of f at z = 0 gives Res (f(z), 0) = 3. Hence from (5) we have
≡
REMARKS
In the application of the limit formulas (1) and (2) for computing residues, the indeterminate form 0/0 may result. Although we are not going to prove it, it should be pointed out that L’Hôpital’s rule is valid in complex analysis. If f(z) = g(z)/h(z), where g and h are analytic at z = z0, g(z0) = 0, h(z0) = 0, and h′(z0) ≠ 0, then
19.5 Exercises Answers to selected odd-numbered problems begin on page ANS-48.
In Problems 1–6, use a Laurent series to find the indicated residue.
- f(z) = ; Res (f(z), 1)
- f(z) = ; Res (f(z), 0)
- f(z) = ; Res (f(z), 0)
- f(z) = (z + 3)2 sin ; Res (f(z), −3)
- f(z) = ; Res (f(z), 0)
- f(z) = ; Res (f(z), 2)
In Problems 7–16, use (1), (2), or (4) to find the residue at each pole of the given function.
- f(z) =
- f(z) =
- f(z) =
- f(z) =
- f(z) =
- f(z) =
- f(z) =
- f(z) =
- f(z) = sec z
- f(z) =
In Problems 17–20, use Cauchy’s residue theorem, where appropriate, to evaluate the given integral along the indicated contours.
-
(a) |z| =
(b) |z| =
(c) |z| = 3
-
(a) |z| = 1
(b) |z − 2i| = 1
(c) |z − 2i| = 4
-
(a) |z| = 5
(b) |z + i| = 2
(c) |z − 3| = 1
-
(a) |z − 2i| = 1
(b) |z − 2i| = 3
(c) |z| = 5
In Problems 21–32, use Cauchy’s residue theorem to evaluate the given integral along the indicated contour.
- C: |z − 3i| = 3
- C: |z − 2| =
- C: |z| = 2
- C is the ellipse 16x2 + y2 = 4
- C: |z| = 2
- C: |z| = 3
- C: |z − 1| = 2
- C: |z| =
- C is the rectangle defined by x = , x = π , y = −1, y = 1
- C is the rectangle defined by x = −2, x = 1, y = −, y = 1
- C: |z − 3| = 1
- C: |z − 1| = 1